Skip to main content

Comparison

Comparison between Theory of Dynamic Matrix and String Theory

TDM postulates converge with string theory on a few broad themes:

  • Reality is not fundamentally made of classical point particles. String theory replaces point particles with one-dimensional strings whose different vibrational modes appear as different particles.
  • Vibration/excitation is fundamental. In string theory, particle properties come from vibrational patterns of the underlying object; in your TDM, physical entities also arise from excitation states of an underlying substrate.
  • Extra geometry may matter. String theory requires extra spacetime dimensions for mathematical consistency, and TDM also argues that ordinary Euclidean 3-space is insufficient for the underlying structure.
  • Gravity should emerge from deeper microphysics. String theory aims to unify gravity with quantum physics, and closed-string excitations include a graviton-like mode; TDM's model likewise tries to derive gravity from a deeper substrate.

Differences are much more important than the similarities:

  • String theory is not an ether theory. It does not posit a universal crystalline medium or neoether whose stresses directly push matter around. Its basic objects are strings and branes in spacetime, not stress nodes in a physical lattice.
  • TDM's theory is mechanistic/substantival; string theory is not. TDM says force, diffusion, photons, and gravity arise from stress gradients in a matrix. String theory does not normally explain interactions as relaxation of a universal elastic network.
  • TDM's determinism diverges from mainstream string theory. String theory is ordinarily formulated within quantum mechanics, so it inherits the standard probabilistic formalism rather than replacing it with a fully deterministic hidden-state or reactive-state picture.
  • TDM's “emergent time from oscillation” idea is also not standard string theory. String theory usually still treats time as part of spacetime, even if spacetime may be emergent in some advanced formulations.

TDM postulates are closer to a substrate-based, deterministic, emergent-medium theory with some string-like motifs than to string theory itself.

TDM is not a version of string theory, but it shares with string theory the intuition that observable particles and forces may arise from deeper vibrational structure and higher-dimensional geometry.